Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Gadgetspotr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
134
Highlights
87
Differences
8
Reactions
0
Likes
Roborock Q5 Max+
vs
Shark RV765:
134 Highlights & 87 Differences —
So, Which Robot Vacuum Actually Works Better
Navigation makes all the difference! Compare how Roborock's advanced mapping stacks up against Shark's simpler approach. Your floors will thank you.
What sets Roborock Q5 Max+ apart from Shark RV765? This robot vacuums face-off compares specs like battery type, app control, cliff sensors & noise level and beyond.
Roborock Q5 Max+ vs Shark RV765: Navigating The Best Robot Vacuum For Your Home
When it comes to upgrading your home cleaning game, choosing between the Roborock Q5 Max+ and the Shark RV765 is a pivotal decision. Both target pet owners and cater to homes ranging from small apartments to larger spaces, aiming to deliver hands-free cleaning convenience. They share key features like app control, voice assistant compatibility, and quiet modes to minimize noise disruption.
However, the Roborock Q5 Max+ fundamentally differs in its sophisticated LIDAR-based navigation offering advanced mapping capabilities, including multi-floor and 3D mapping. At the same time, the Shark RV765 relies on adaptive navigation without LIDAR and lacks smart mapping.
Further divergences extend into cleaning power, battery life, dustbin capacity, and smart home integration, making each suited to distinct household needs. The Roborock boasts a robust 5500 Pa suction system with five suction levels, coupled with an auto carpet boost, while the Shark's suction peaks at a modest 1500 Pa without auto boost; both sacrifice mopping functions, focusing exclusively on vacuuming performance. Let's delve into the nuances that set these two robots apart.
Roborock Q5 Max+: A High-Tech Cleaning Marvel for Complex Spaces
The Roborock Q5 Max+ impresses with its elite navigation framework, driven by LIDAR and SLAM technology. This enables it to craft precise, editable maps with multi-floor mapping support and cloud synchronization, so your cleaning strategy adapts seamlessly across up to four floors. The smart mapping and room recognition, combined with virtual walls and no-go zones, allow for meticulous zone and selective room cleaning.
Cleaning-wise, this model's 5500 Pa suction power and a thoughtfully designed rubber main brush yield a dirt pickup rate as high as 90%, excelling on carpets and hard floors. Its five suction levels, edge and spot cleaning modes, and auto carpet boost ensure comprehensive coverage with a wide cleaning area of 3767 sq. ft., suitable for larger households.
Roborock's filtration system outshines with a 26 oz top-mounted dustbin using disposable bags and dirt compression, paired with an E11 anti-allergen filter and bin full indicator; all designed to lower maintenance frequency to about 50 days per emptying cycle. This is a boon for allergy sufferers and busy users alike. The robot runs on a large 5200 mAh battery providing up to 240 minutes of runtime and fast charging, supported by smart charge control and replaceable batteries, ideal for expansive cleaning tasks.
Additional touches include safety features such as a child lock, flame-retardant materials, and a suite of sensors like a gyroscope and accelerometer for precise navigation and obstacle avoidance. Maintenance is eased by handy indicators for filter and brush replacement and a self-cleaning brush, ensuring longevity. The advanced dock features also support automatic dirt emptying, making this vacuum an autonomous powerhouse.
Shark RV765: A Lightweight, Budget-Conscious Choice for Simpler Cleaning Needs
On the other hand, the Shark RV765 stands out for its smaller size and lighter weight; measuring approximately 12.6"x12.4"x3.54" and weighing under 10 lbs, which lends itself to easier handling, storage, and efficiency in tighter spaces. Its adaptive navigation system works well enough for one-floor layouts. Still, it lacks the precision and mapping depth of the Roborock's LIDAR system, making it better suited for simpler home layouts.
Cleaning power takes a back seat with its 1500 Pa suction and two suction levels; it doesn't have carpet boost or advanced brush adjustments, but it still covers up to 1200 sq.ft with edge and spot cleaning modes supported by dual side brushes. The hybrid brush design accommodates mixed flooring types, including hardwood, tile, laminate, vinyl, and marble.
The Shark's 16-ozz bagless dustbin is smaller and requires manual emptying roughly every week, due partly to the lack of compression and bin full alerts. For filtration, it offers a single-layer, non-washable filter without anti-allergen systems, meaning maintenance is more frequent and less suited for allergy-prone homes.
Battery life maxes out at 120 minutes from its 2550 mAh power source, with standard charging that lacks fast or smart control. While the dock is simpler, it supports auto recharge and resume, standard comforts in this price segment. The robot integrates basic app control and voice assistant compatibility, with multi-user support and OTA updates, but lacks advanced scheduling and zoning features.
Safety features cover essential sensors like cliff detection and bumpers, but omit higher-end additions such as gyroscope, wheel lift sensors, or child safety locks found in the Q5 Max+. Materials are conventional with no flame retardancy or environmental certifications. Notably, Shark offers a warranty extension option, which might appeal to budget-conscious buyers looking to upgrade their device lifespan.
Quick Take
The Roborock Q5 Max+ wins on most fronts: navigation precision, cleaning power, filtration, battery life, and intelligent home integration, making it a smart pick for larger, multi-floor homes and users with pets. Meanwhile, the Shark RV765 appeals as a lighter, simpler vacuum for smaller spaces and users prioritizing budget over state-of-the-art tech, although it comes with shorter runtime and more frequent maintenance needs.
Bottom Line
If your home demands thorough and customizable cleaning with minimal upkeep, the $329.99 Roborock Q5 Max+ delivers advanced technology and robust functionality worth the investment. For those on a tighter budget or with smaller, less complex spaces, the Shark RV765 offers an acceptable compromise with straightforward operation and a lighter design.
Verdict
Winner: Roborock Q5 Max+; excels in advanced navigation, superior suction, extended runtime, and allergy-friendly filtration, perfect for large, multi-floor homes needing precise and deep cleaning.
Runner-up: Shark RV765; affordable, compact, and easy to use for smaller homes, but limited in suction power, smart features, and maintenance convenience.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
Not sure which smart tech to go for? We compared Roborock Q5 Max+ vs Shark RV765 down to every detail — including specs, perks, and what users are really saying.
Roborock Q5 Max+ model number is 'Q5 Max+', while Shark RV765 uses 'RV765'. This reflects their distinct model identifiers used for support and warranties.
Unique identifier used for the vacuum model.
In the battle of Model Number,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
worse than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Model Number on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
The Model Line shows Roborock Q5 Max+ belongs to 'Q Series', whereas Shark RV765 is part of 'Shark ION'. This indicates their respective brand series positioning.
Series or family name the product belongs to.
In the battle of Model Line,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
17 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Model Line on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
Release Year for Roborock Q5 Max+ is 2023, contrasting with the 2019 release year of Shark RV765. The newer model likely benefits from recent tech improvements.
vs
Score History
Updated at 2025-12-17 06:45:36: 0Updated at 2025-12-22 08:10:41: 89Updated at 2026-04-10 07:26:56: 92
Score info for Roborock Q5 Max+:
We base our scoring on 'Release Year' on the following:
Score 92: One of the most recent years in the list except 2024, 2025, and 2026.. Score reduced because release date is older
Score info for Shark RV765:
We base our scoring on 'Release Year' on the following:
Score 80: More recent than 2018 and earlier.. Score reduced because release date is older
The year the robot vacuum was released.
In the battle of Release Year,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Release Year on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
78
Roborock Q5 Max+
0Votes
Pet Owners, Large Homes, Small Apartments
58
Shark RV765
0Votes
Pet Owners, Large Homes, Small Apartments
vs
Score History
Updated at 2025-12-17 06:45:36: 0Updated at 2025-12-22 08:10:41: 92Updated at 2026-04-10 07:26:56: 93
Score info for Roborock Q5 Max+:
We base our scoring on 'Target Audience' on the following:
Score 93: Clearly defines a specific user base; directly relates to intended user base. | Indicates a user environment but less specific about user demographic.. Score reduced because release date is older
Score info for Shark RV765:
We base our scoring on 'Target Audience' on the following:
Score 85: User base specifies a particular demographic, indicating some specialization. | User base defined by physical size, basic categorization without advanced implication. | Similar to Large Homes, size-based categorization without advanced relevance.. Score reduced because release date is older
Intended user base for the product.
In the battle of Target Audience,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
20 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Target Audience on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
Navigation Type is 'Structured, Logical' for Roborock Q5 Max+ but 'Adaptive' for Shark RV765. Roborock uses advanced navigation vs Shark's simpler adaptive system.
vs
Score History
Updated at 2025-12-17 06:45:36: 0Updated at 2025-12-22 08:10:41: 93Updated at 2026-04-10 07:26:56: 94
Score info for Roborock Q5 Max+:
We base our scoring on 'Navigation Type' on the following:
Score 94: Basic organized method, likely manual or simple pattern, less advanced. | Suggests structured method but less advanced or intelligent than AI-based options.. Score reduced because release date is older
Score info for Shark RV765:
We base our scoring on 'Navigation Type' on the following:
Score 75: Implies some ability to adjust navigation, showing moderate advancement.. Score reduced because release date is older
The basic navigation method used by the vacuum.
In the battle of Navigation Type,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
worse than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
lower
17 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Navigation Type on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Camera Based Navigation,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
same as
Shark RV765 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Camera Based Navigation on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Night Vision Navigation,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
same as
Shark RV765 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Night Vision Navigation on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
Virtual Walls/No-Go Zones functionality exists in both Roborock Q5 Max+ and Shark RV765, allowing designated cleaning restrictions.
Ability to set virtual boundaries in the app.
In the battle of Virtual Walls/No-Go Zones,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Virtual Walls/No-Go Zones on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Shark RV765
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Roborock Q5 Max+
Cleans edges effectively, picking up debris along walls and corners with 85% efficiency.
Efficiency of cleaning near edges.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Edge Coverage Efficiency on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
Updated at 2025-12-17 06:45:36: 0Updated at 2025-12-22 08:10:41: 89Updated at 2026-04-10 07:26:56: 90
Updated at 2025-12-17 05:00:20: 0Updated at 2025-12-22 08:34:44: 85Updated at 2026-04-10 03:25:57: 90
Score info for Roborock Q5 Max+:
We base our scoring on 'Max Cleaning Cycles Per Day' on the following:
Score 90: Fixed number lower than several other numeric values.. Score reduced because release date is older
Score info for Shark RV765:
We base our scoring on 'Max Cleaning Cycles Per Day' on the following:
Score 90: Fixed number below median, limited capacity.. Score reduced because release date is older
Maximum number of cleaning runs per day.
In the battle of Max Cleaning Cycles Per Day,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Max Cleaning Cycles Per Day on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
Carpet Detection Sensor is available on Roborock Q5 Max+ but absent on Shark RV765, enabling automatic surface detection.
Detects carpets to adjust suction.
In the battle of Carpet Detection Sensor,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
46 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Carpet Detection Sensor on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
Floor Type Compatibility is identical with both supporting Hardwood, Carpet, Tile, and Laminate, though Shark extends to Vinyl and Marble.
vs
Score History
Updated at 2025-12-17 06:45:36: 0Updated at 2025-12-22 08:10:41: 82Updated at 2026-04-10 07:26:56: 83
Score info for Roborock Q5 Max+:
We base our scoring on 'Floor Type Compatibility' on the following:
Score 83: Common individual surface, basic category.. Score reduced because release date is older
Score info for Shark RV765:
We base our scoring on 'Floor Type Compatibility' on the following:
Score 80: Common surface type, basic material.. Score reduced because release date is older
Surfaces the vacuum is designed for.
In the battle of Floor Type Compatibility,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Floor Type Compatibility on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Shark RV765
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Roborock Q5 Max+
Highly efficient dust retention, capturing nearly all dust particles for cleaner air.
Efficiency of capturing fine dust.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Max Dust Retention Efficiency on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Empty Notification exists in Roborock Q5 Max+ but is missing on Shark RV765, aiding user reminders.
Sends alert when dustbin auto emptied.
In the battle of Auto Empty Notification,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
worse than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Empty Notification on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Auto Mop Lift on Carpet,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
same as
Shark RV765 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Mop Lift on Carpet on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
Around 500 charge cycles is a common design target; with a few runs per week, that can mean several years of use before noticeable capacity loss.
Maximum charge cycles supported by battery.
In the battle of Max Battery Life Cycles,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
49 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Max Battery Life Cycles on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Battery Level Indicator,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Level Indicator on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
Dock Alignment Assistance is 'Yes' on Roborock Q5 Max+ but not on Shark RV765, easing docking on Roborock.
Helps align with dock correctly.
In the battle of Dock Alignment Assistance,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
45 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dock Alignment Assistance on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
88
Roborock Q5 Max+
0Votes
Alexa, Google Assistant
80
Shark RV765
0Votes
Alexa, Google Assistant
Compatible voice assistants.
In the battle of Voice Assistant Compatibility,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Assistant Compatibility on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
Selective Room Cleaning is enabled only on Roborock Q5 Max+, allowing targeted cleaning by room or zone.
Allows cleaning of specific rooms.
In the battle of Selective Room Cleaning,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
45 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Selective Room Cleaning on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Object Recognition Sensor,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
same as
Shark RV765 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Object Recognition Sensor on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Smart Charging Scheduler,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
worse than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Charging Scheduler on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Cleaning Time Scheduling,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cleaning Time Scheduling on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Lost Robot Locator,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
same as
Shark RV765 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lost Robot Locator on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
AI-Powered Obstacle Recognition
Does it have AI-powered obstacle recognition?
No
0Votes
Roborock Q5 Max+
No
0Votes
Shark RV765
Recognizes obstacles using AI.
In the battle of AI-Powered Obstacle Recognition,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
same as
Shark RV765 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
AI-Powered Obstacle Recognition on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
Eco Mode
Does it have eco mode?
Yes
0Votes
Roborock Q5 Max+
Yes
0Votes
Shark RV765
Energy saving mode for reduced power use.
In the battle of Eco Mode,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Eco Mode on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Short Circuit Protection,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Short Circuit Protection on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Battery Safety Certification,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Safety Certification on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
Flame Retardant Materials are used in Roborock Q5 Max+ but not in Shark RV765, enhancing safety in Roborock.
Uses flame resistant housing.
In the battle of Flame Retardant Materials,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
45 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Flame Retardant Materials on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
Overheat Protection
Does it have overheat protection?
Yes
0Votes
Roborock Q5 Max+
Yes
0Votes
Shark RV765
Prevents overheating damage.
In the battle of Overheat Protection,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overheat Protection on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Energy Star Certification,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
same as
Shark RV765 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Star Certification on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Power Consumption Standby,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
lower
2.5 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Consumption Standby on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Power Consumption Cleaning,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
lower
5.3 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Consumption Cleaning on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Power Consumption Charging,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
worse than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
14.7 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Consumption Charging on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Material Safety Certification,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
50 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Material Safety Certification on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature range where the vacuum operates safely.
In the battle of Operating Temperature Range,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Range on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Operating Humidity Range,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
15 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Humidity Range on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
Whether a bottle of cleaning solution is provided.
In the battle of Starter Cleaning Solution,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
same as
Shark RV765 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Starter Cleaning Solution on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
Filter Replacement Indicator available on Roborock Q5 Max+ but missing on Shark RV765, aiding maintenance.
Notifies when filter needs replacing.
In the battle of Filter Replacement Indicator,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
43 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Filter Replacement Indicator on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
Brush Replacement Indicator present on Roborock Q5 Max+ but absent on Shark RV765, improving upkeep scheduling.
Notifies when brush needs replacing.
In the battle of Brush Replacement Indicator,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
43 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Brush Replacement Indicator on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Modular Component Replacement,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Modular Component Replacement on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
90
Roborock Q5 Max+
0Votes
Phone, Email, Chat, App Support
40
Shark RV765
0Votes
Phone, Email, Chat, App Support
vs
Score History
Updated at 2025-12-17 05:00:21: 0Updated at 2025-12-22 08:34:44: 85Updated at 2026-04-10 03:25:57: 90
Score info for Shark RV765:
We base our scoring on 'Customer Support Channels' on the following:
Score 90: Basic and traditional support method. | Slightly more modern than phone, but still basic. | More modern, real-time interaction. | Indicates support through an app, more advanced.. Score reduced because release date is older
Available support methods.
In the battle of Customer Support Channels,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
50 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Customer Support Channels on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Service Appointments Online,
Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉ is
better than
Shark RV765 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Service Appointments Online on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Warranty Extension Option on Roborock Q5 Max+ ◉
vs Shark RV765 ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Cleaning Performance
How would you rate the cleaning performance of this robot vacuum?
Excellent — Picks up all debris and cleans every corner with ease.
0Votes
0Votes
Very Good — Cleans most areas with minor spots left.
0Votes
0Votes
Good — Cleans effectively, but some areas need a little attention.
0Votes
0Votes
Fair — Leaves debris in some areas and may require additional cleaning.
0Votes
0Votes
Poor — Struggles to clean and leaves significant debris behind.
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Life
How would you rate the battery life of this robot vacuum?
Excellent — Runs for 2+ hours on a single charge.
0Votes
0Votes
Very Good — Runs for 1.5 to 2 hours on a single charge.
0Votes
0Votes
Good — Runs for 1 to 1.5 hours on a single charge.
0Votes
0Votes
Fair — Runs for 30 to 60 minutes on a single charge.
0Votes
0Votes
Poor — Runs for less than 30 minutes on a single charge.
0Votes
0Votes
Noise Level
How would you rate the noise level of this robot vacuum?
Very Quiet — Barely noticeable even in a quiet room.
0Votes
0Votes
Quiet — Slightly noticeable but not disruptive.
0Votes
0Votes
Average — Noticeable and can be a bit distracting.
0Votes
0Votes
Loud — Noticeable and bothersome in quiet spaces.
0Votes
0Votes
Very Loud — Distracting and uncomfortable to be around.
0Votes
0Votes
Ease of Setup
How easy was it to set up this robot vacuum?
Very Easy — Set up was quick and intuitive with no issues.
0Votes
0Votes
Easy — Simple setup with minimal guidance needed.
0Votes
0Votes
Average — Took a bit of time but manageable with instructions.
0Votes
0Votes
Difficult — Had trouble setting it up and needed assistance.
0Votes
0Votes
Very Difficult — Setup was complicated and confusing.
0Votes
0Votes
Design Appeal
How would you rate the design and appearance of this robot vacuum?
Stylish — Sleek, modern design that fits well in any room.
0Votes
0Votes
Attractive — Looks good and suits most home styles.
0Votes
0Votes
Neutral — Basic design that doesn't stand out.
0Votes
0Votes
Unattractive — Design feels bulky or outdated.
0Votes
0Votes
Poor — Design is unappealing and doesn't blend well in the home.
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing
How would you rate the value for money of this robot vacuum?
Great value for money — You get more than what you paid for.
0Votes
0Votes
Pretty good price — Worth the price for the features.
0Votes
0Votes
Fair deal — Reasonable for what it offers.
0Votes
0Votes
Kinda pricey — Expensive for what it does.
0Votes
0Votes
Crazy expensive — The price is too high for the features offered.
0Votes
0Votes
Cleaning Modes
How would you rate the variety and effectiveness of cleaning modes?
Excellent — Multiple modes that work well for different floor types and needs.
0Votes
0Votes
Very Good — Several modes that cover most cleaning situations.
0Votes
0Votes
Good — Few modes, but they get the job done.
0Votes
0Votes
Fair — Limited modes and may require manual intervention.
0Votes
0Votes
Poor — Only one cleaning mode, insufficient for all needs.
0Votes
0Votes
Navigation and Mapping
How would you rate the robot vacuum’s navigation and mapping ability?
Excellent — Very precise, maps entire home, avoids obstacles effectively.
0Votes
0Votes
Very Good — Maps large areas with few obstacles.
0Votes
0Votes
Good — Navigates well but occasionally bumps into things.
0Votes
0Votes
Fair — Struggles with navigation and often misses areas.
0Votes
0Votes
Poor — Poor at mapping or getting stuck frequently.
0Votes
0Votes
App and Smart Features
How would you rate the app and smart features of this robot vacuum?
Excellent — Easy to use app with great features like scheduling, remote control, and updates.
0Votes
0Votes
Very Good — App is functional with scheduling and cleaning status features.
0Votes
0Votes
Good — App works, but lacks advanced features.
0Votes
0Votes
Fair — App is limited and occasionally buggy.
0Votes
0Votes
Poor — App is difficult to use or doesn’t work properly.
0Votes
0Votes
Durability and Build Quality
How would you rate the durability and build quality of this robot vacuum?
Excellent — Sturdy construction, feels premium, and built to last.
0Votes
0Votes
Very Good — Well-built, feels solid with no major issues.
0Votes
0Votes
Good — Decent build quality but feels a bit flimsy at times.
0Votes
0Votes
Fair — Some parts feel weak or cheaply made.
0Votes
0Votes
Poor — Fragile and prone to damage from regular use.